Rüdiger Sonderfeld <ruedi...@c-plusplus.de> writes:
> On Wednesday 02 September 2015 21:58:17 Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>> Rüdiger Sonderfeld <ruedi...@c-plusplus.net> writes:
>> > + (let ((prop (org-find-property "DATE_WEEK_TREE")))
>>
>> I don't think we need to introduce a new property for that. DATE_TREE is
>> enough.
>
> Since DATE_TREE and DATE_WEEK_TREE (or WEEK_TREE instead?) are structured
> differently it might make sense to keep the property separated.
If you want both a date tree and a week tree in the same, you probably
want them to start at the same level, don't you?
>> > + ;; ISO 8601 week format is %G-W%V(-%u)
>> > + (org-datetree--find-create "^\\*+[
>> > \t]+\\([12][0-9]\\{3\\}\\)\\(\\s-*?\\([
>> > \t]:[[:alnum:]:_@#%%]+:\\)?\\s-*$\\)"
>> Isn't this line too long?
>
> What's the limit? Because if it's 80 char then I'd need to do some `concat'
> ugliness because the regex is over 80 char long.
You can use continuation markup, i.e., "\\n".
Regards,
