Peter Frings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 07 Nov 2008, at 16:33, Peter Jones wrote: > >> Ben Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> I normally use Aquamacs. It's very pretty, and uses the mouse >>> without >>> having to start an X server. >> >> [snip] >> >> Ben, Aquamacs isn't the only option for Emacs on Mac OS X, it's >> actually >> the worst option for Emacs on Mac OS X, IMHO. > > I second that. I've been using Carbon Emacs 22.2.50.1 and its > predecessors for years now, trying Aquamacs now and then, but never > felt the urge to switch. Do check it out.
I third that. Carbon Emacs is the only emacs package for OS X that works like Emacs is supposed to. It also comes with a lot more elisp goodness (i.e., more packages) by default. IMHO, Aquamacs tries to make Emacs behave like a very simple Carbon program (e.g., like Text Edit). Matt _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
