Sebastian Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> ,---- >> | first term: and it's definition >> | second: and it's definition >> `---- > > > How should Org distinguish those colons from other colons?
yes, I suppose the double colons you show below would be required >> would be much preferable to what I currently often find myself doing >> which is >> >> ,---- >> | - *first term*: and it's definition >> | - *second*: and it's definition >> `---- > > > This is what I did too :-) I even wrote a little little elisp function > to do this for me. But since a few weeks there is: > > > - Term1 :: description (try to press ALT-RET here) > - Term2 :: description (try to press ALT-RET here) > > > Are you aware of this syntax? No, I was not aware of that, it is exactly what I was after. Thanks -- Eric _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
