Hmmmm,
this is *such* a good idea, that I will implement this retroactively
into all versions since ... 2.0 or so? Abracadabra! Done.
In fact, it has been working just so for a very long time.
file:foo.html -> href="foo.html"
file:foo.org -> href="foo.html"
The second line assumes that the org file foo.org will also
be converted to an html file in the publishing process....
Also, I was mistaken earlier:
http:foo.html becomes href="http:foo.html" and not href="foo.html"
so this actually cannot be used for a local link.
So what remains from this exchange? Should we accept links
that look like absolute file names (including ./foo.html) as
equivalent to file:./foo.html ?
- Carsten
On Apr 13, 2008, at 6:25 PM, T. V. Raman wrote:
I think writing http:foo.html is a bad idea because typing that
string in other contexts is sort of meaningless as a URL.
Until now, everything one types in org-mode sort of has meaning
elsewhere. If you want it to look like a url in this case too
then I'd suggest file:foo.html -- rther than http:file.html.
I did not suggest that earlier because it's more chars to type,
but that's not a huge concern since emacs does the typing, and we
could always augment c-c c-l to enable authoring of relative
links with file completion.
so file:a/b/c.html would become href="a/b/c.html" in the
generated html.
"Carsten" == Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Carsten> On Apr 13, 2008, at 5:33 PM, T. V. Raman wrote:
Carsten>
I've not tried http:foo.html -- but I suggest doing that
to author a relative URL is a bad idea.
Carsten>
Carsten> Can you explain why you think that this is a bad
Carsten> idea? Educate me! What is wrong with writing
Carsten> http:foo.html ??????
Carsten>
Carsten> - Carsten
Carsten>
I tried ./foo.html and that didn't work either. One compromise
would be to get ./foo.html to link to a relative url,
while foo.html continues to link to a local anchor
"Carsten" == Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
Carsten> On Apr 13, 2008, at 6:49 AM, T. V. Raman wrote:
Carsten>
Hi,
org-export turns links of the form [[foo][link to
relative url foo]]
ends up creating links of the form <a
href="#foo">...</a>
this means that it becomes impossible to write
hyperlinks that are relative URLs.
Carsten>
Carsten> Hi Raman,
Carsten>
Carsten> the url goes into the first pair of square brackets,
Carsten> the description into the second. If you put
Carsten> something into the first bracket pair that does not
Carsten> look lie a url, it will be treated as an internal
Carsten> link.
Carsten>
Carsten> Have you tried to use something like
Carsten>
Carsten> [[http:foo.html][link to relative url]]
Carsten>
Carsten> ?
Carsten>
Carsten> - Carsten
--
Best Regards, --raman
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW:
http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/ AIM: emacspeak GTalk:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP:
http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/raman-almaden.asc Google:
tv+raman IRC: irc://irc.freenode.net/#emacs
--
Best Regards,
--raman
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/
AIM: emacspeak GTalk: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/raman-almaden.asc
Google: tv+raman
IRC: irc://irc.freenode.net/#emacs
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
