On Apr 13, 2008, at 5:33 PM, T. V. Raman wrote:
I've not tried http:foo.html -- but I suggest doing that to
author a relative URL is a bad idea.
Can you explain why you think that this is a bad idea?
Educate me! What is wrong with writing http:foo.html ??????
- Carsten
I tried ./foo.html and that didn't work either. One compromise
would be to get ./foo.html to link to a relative url, while
foo.html continues to link to a local anchor
"Carsten" == Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Carsten> On Apr 13, 2008, at 6:49 AM, T. V. Raman wrote:
Carsten>
Hi,
org-export turns links of the form [[foo][link to relative
url foo]]
ends up creating links of the form <a href="#foo">...</a>
this means that it becomes impossible to write hyperlinks
that are relative URLs.
Carsten>
Carsten> Hi Raman,
Carsten>
Carsten> the url goes into the first pair of square brackets,
Carsten> the description into the second. If you put
Carsten> something into the first bracket pair that does not
Carsten> look lie a url, it will be treated as an internal
Carsten> link.
Carsten>
Carsten> Have you tried to use something like
Carsten>
Carsten> [[http:foo.html][link to relative url]]
Carsten>
Carsten> ?
Carsten>
Carsten> - Carsten
--
Best Regards,
--raman
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/
AIM: emacspeak GTalk: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/raman-almaden.asc
Google: tv+raman
IRC: irc://irc.freenode.net/#emacs
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
