Bastien Guerry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Xin Shi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Is that possible to make it kill the buffer on the C-c C-e h case? Or
>> let user to customize this behavior?  I don't know the reason to keep
>> that buffer in this case.  
>
> I don't know what the default should be, I have no personal preference.
> I think it's quite useful to have the exported file accessible through
> the list of buffers even if you don't want to jump to it.

I second that.  Because I use `midnight' to take care of
useless buffers and `ido' does well on choosing buffers,
leaving such a buffer open is not completely useless, if
people have enough RAM.

>
> But I certainly wouldn't go for an option about this.
>
> What people think?

I think it could be an option, if someone thinks he/she
would use it.  At the very least, we can have an option to
keep our environment green.


And a second thought on Xin's issue.  I believe the one whom
we should blame to is nXhtml mode, because if I understand
correctly, his problem is that an additional window being
created by nXhtml mode, when the html file is generated.  So
I would guess that even if the buffer is killed after the
generation, that additional nXhtml window would still be
there.  Therefore, I would suggest that Xin disable the
annoying/useless behaviour of nXhtml mode.

Xiao-Yong
-- 
    c/*    __o/*
    <\     * (__
    */\      <


_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode

Reply via email to