Salutations! > Hi Dennis, thanks for the patch. > > I am not sure yet if you are using the right condition though. It seems to > me that extending the late-warning-period makes sens only for repeating > *tasks*, where the base date keeps changing each time you mark this entry > as DONE. So maybe the condition should be that it is today *and* that the > item is a task marked by a TODO keyword.
Hmm, that may be -- every entry that has a date is a TODO for me. I would think that a non-todo entry (repeating or not) should only occur on the day(s) where it's scheduled, since there is no way to mark it "done" and get it off of today's agenda. > Or: maybe for Scheduled, we should no relate to the *nearest* match of the > repeater, but to the most recent one. This way you would get over-due > warnings right up to the day where the next occurrence of this item is > scheduled. So you would never loose sight on the item. However, if we do this, we lose information on *how* overdue a particular item is. I tend to keep things on the agenda and let the large numbers shame me into getting things done... Dennis Lin _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
