On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 11:39:21PM +0100, Giovanni Ridolfi wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 08:44:08AM +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> > On Dec 31, 2007, at 4:21 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> >> * Long task/project not yet broken down into sub-tasks
> >> SCHEDULED: <2008-01-07 Mon>
> >> SCHEDULED: <2008-01-08 Tue>
> >>
> >> and it appears in both places in an agenda view, and you can jump back
> >> to the item in the normal way. The only downside is that C-c C-s
> >> doesn't currently support entering it:
> >>
> >> (org-schedule &optional REMOVE)
> >
> > If I nt forward to implement this, should the extra SCHEDULED stamp
> > be in the same second line of the entry, or in an extra line? Any
> > other votes on this issue?
>
> I think it can be done in this way:
>
> * Long task
> SCHEDULED: <2008-01-03 gio>--<2008-01-04 ven>
>
> Well, I've just written it (by hand ;-) and
> I've scheduled "long task" in both days (today and tomorrow) in the Agenda.
That's a nice idea, but it won't cover all eventualities,
e.g. sometimes one would need:
* Long task
SCHEDULED: <2008-01-07 Mon 10:00-13:00>
SCHEDULED: <2008-01-08 Tue 14:00-17:00>
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
