I'm new to emacs and org-mode, so please forgive me if I've missed something fundamental.
I've been using org-tree-to-indirect-buffer bound to the default C-c C-x b, and saw in the help that you can modify org-indirect-buffer-display. In my .emacs file, I've got the following: (setq org-indirect-buffer-display 'new-frame) When I hit C-c C-x b on a subtree, I do indeed get a narrowed subtree in a new frame (call it frame 2). When I go back to the original frame and repeat for a different subtree, that works too, but the buffer in frame 2 is killed. The help for org-tree-to-indirect-buffer says that a C-u prefix will keep the last buffer, and this works as stated: the buffer in frame 2 is then kept. So my question: if C-u controls the persistence of the previous buffer, what is intended difference between new-frame and dedicated-frame? I had expected C-c C-x b with new-frame to work the same as C-u C-c C-x b with dedicated-frame, and I feel that new-frame is redundant. I don't see why anyone would want to keep opening new frames whilst killing the indirect buffers in the previous ones. -- Chris Randle _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
