That's certainly an option. But usually I like to mark any "actionable"
items with "TODO", while using non-TODO entries to record information,
or to group TODOs into logical groups. Like this:
* Dental
*** TODO See Dr. Xyz for cleaning
<2007-11-29 Thu 09:00>
* Medical
*** TODO See Dr. Abc for routine exam
* Useful Websites
Conceptually, I think it is cleaner that way (if the entry indicates
some action, have a "TODO" keyword. How that action is scheduled is a
separate issue.). Physiologically, If I know in my org system certain
entries need action but don't have a TODO keyword, my trust of the
system will decrease since there are many functions in org-mode that
operates on TODO entries only (or better so). Also, with a TODO keyword,
I can change the state of it (I can cancel it, I can mark it done and
etc.). Further, sometimes you just want to create a TODO entry like "See
Dr. Abc", and later make it an appointment by adding a time stamp. It
seems awkward to me that I need to remove the "TODO" keyword once I have
that item scheduled as an appointment.
In short, I think we should mark appointments as "TODO" entries and have
appointments removed from the TODO item list if "ignore-scheduled" is
turned on.
Wanrong
Carsten Dominik wrote:
On Oct 14, 2007, at 5:35, Wanrong Lin wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to follow GTD's principle that tasks should be reviewed
regularly. So I first turn on "org-agenda-todo-ignore-scheduled", and
do a "List of all TODO entries, and then review all tasks in the
list. However, I found that tasks with plain active time stamps
("appointment tasks") are also listed. Should we exclude them when
org-agenda-todo-ignore-scheduled is set to "t"?
Wouldn't it be better to not mark appointments TODO?
- Carsten
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
