"Eddward DeVilla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 10/8/07, John Wiegley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> How about just having generalized Lisp triggers: > [snip] > > This could be dangerous. Org file are (most) text. The more code you > allow to be embedded, the more of a vector org-mode becomes for trojan > horse attacks. Of course I've been using lisp in tables formulas more > and more, so I am a hypocrite. I'd love a way to embed lisp trigger > into properties, but they probably ought to be in the .emacs or the > like. > > Edd
I'm interested in this. Why would an Org file with permissions like 700 be any more virus friendly than an .emacs with the same permissions? Een taking the windows case, a .emacs is executed each and every time, but the org file only when loaded and acted upon. > > > _______________________________________________ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
