Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Priority cycling is a bit odd. When I use M-n to cycle, it turns >> from #C-> nil-> #C-> nil, and M-p will be #A->nil->#A->nil. > > I did it like this on purpose, because I wanted S-up to > immediately increase the priority.
I would vote for something very simple: <S-up> increases priority, <S-down> decreases priority. <S-up> : nil -> [#A] -> [#B] -> [#C] -> nil [#A] -> [#B] -> [#C] -> nil -> [#A] [#B] -> [#C] -> nil -> [#A] -> [#B] [...] <S-down> : nil -> [#C] -> [#B] -> [#A] -> nil [#A] -> nil -> [#C] -> [#B] -> [#A] [#B] -> [#A] -> nil -> [#C] -> [#B] [...] I know it wouldn't be aware of the default priority, but I would still prefer this behavior over another one. For making the priority setting aware of the default priority I would better use this: <S-up> : increase priority (by with normal cycling) <S-down> : switch default priority / nil But I still prefer the very simple interface... as I tend to think priority handling should be as smooth (and sober) as possible. -- Bastien _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode