Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Priority cycling is a bit odd. When I use M-n to cycle, it turns
>> from #C-> nil-> #C-> nil, and M-p will be #A->nil->#A->nil.
>
> I did it like this on purpose, because I wanted S-up to
> immediately increase the priority.
I would vote for something very simple:
<S-up> increases priority, <S-down> decreases priority.
<S-up> : nil -> [#A] -> [#B] -> [#C] -> nil
[#A] -> [#B] -> [#C] -> nil -> [#A]
[#B] -> [#C] -> nil -> [#A] -> [#B]
[...]
<S-down> : nil -> [#C] -> [#B] -> [#A] -> nil
[#A] -> nil -> [#C] -> [#B] -> [#A]
[#B] -> [#A] -> nil -> [#C] -> [#B]
[...]
I know it wouldn't be aware of the default priority, but I would still
prefer this behavior over another one.
For making the priority setting aware of the default priority I would
better use this:
<S-up> : increase priority (by with normal cycling)
<S-down> : switch default priority / nil
But I still prefer the very simple interface... as I tend to think
priority handling should be as smooth (and sober) as possible.
--
Bastien
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
