On Thursday, 3 June 2021 at 13:54:58 UTC-4 [email protected] wrote:
> > > About 4, what if we call it --fail-if-any? Or alternatively, > --at-most=0 (and you can set it to any positive integer)? > > `at-most` is short and sweet 👍 > > I think it's important for this flag name to communicate that it will > cause a failure. at-most sounds like it would simply limit graph depth, > rather than return a non-zero status code if the graph is over a certain > depth. > > Maybe --failure-depth=2 or --fail-at=3? > Agreed, `--fail-at=1` or `--fail-above=0` seem clearer -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elixir-lang-core" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/01896960-5f36-4a4d-859f-4f14dd4dc452n%40googlegroups.com.
