Hey Spencer, Considering how concise the snippet of code you showed is even without URI.encode_query/2, I think the value of having a smaller API surface is higher than the value of adding a function that you can replace with just a few more characters. Thoughts?
On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 7:28 PM [email protected] < [email protected]> wrote: > I would like to propose the addition of URI.encode_query/2 to the URI > module to facilitate URI construction in a pipe friendly fashion. > > Here is an example MR on my fork of elixir > https://github.com/spencerdcarlson/elixir/pull/2 > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "elixir-lang-core" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/7e297574-b4d0-4b03-8279-4abe50c191e0n%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/7e297574-b4d0-4b03-8279-4abe50c191e0n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elixir-lang-core" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/CAM9Rf%2BKkTGR%3DG2bRApfhr51XD8RHr1HbZZg-Ef%3DJ8rb5aOOR5A%40mail.gmail.com.
