Hi Frank, On Fri, 2019-12-13 at 14:25 -0500, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > > I see, I missed that both functions are only called after first > > checking the archive type. I think it might be helpful/clearer if > > both methods would be called with the intended archive type then, > > also because that might make it simpler to... > > The archive subtype (rpm vs deb) is not stored in the database, as > this would break the current schema, and is really not needed. In any > case, it's easily recovered for purpose of separate metrics. Following > sur-patch added to fche/debuginfod-deb branch:
I think this is ready to be squashed and put on master. I had hoped out Debian/Ubuntu friends would speak up. But they had their chance and will now have to live with the code as is :) Cheers, Mark
