I've had experience with LECO and Carlo-Erba, and preferred the LECO.

We have had a LECO TruSpec for seven years, and performance and reproducibility 
of results have been excellent (comparable to CE).  It has operated without 
hiccup, maintenance is super easy, and the engineers at LECO can help you 
troubleshoot over the phone, so we've never had a service contract or an 
on-site visit.  Our installation engineer was with us for a week for training, 
but you can also go to workshops at the LECO headquarters.

LECO is also student-friendly and student-proof, the latter being of immense 
value if you plan using the equipment for teaching labs.  You can prep samples 
in tin foils (solids) or capsules (liquids), and analyze larger samples, which 
is great for those with limited manual dexterity.

I noticed the note about the start-up issues with N analysis.  Starting/ 
stopping the unit is not recommended by LECO- ours stays on 24/7 in gas 
conservation mode, and it's ready to go in 10min.  Stop/starting also increases 
the probability of cracking the combustion tube.

Louise Egerton-Warburton

Soil & Microbial Ecologist
Chicago Botanic Garden | 1000 Lake Cook Rd | Glencoe IL 60022

From: "Ecological Society of America: grants, jobs, news" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of 
Richard Boyce <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Reply-To: Richard Boyce <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Thursday, December 15, 2016 at 6:58 AM
To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] CHN analyzer

I now have a Thermo EA1112 (really a Carlo-Erba) CHN analyzer, and I had a LECO 
before I came to my present position.

I highly recommend the Carlo-Erba. I've had it for about 7 years, and it is the 
most solid piece of equipment I have in my lab. My use is intermittent, yet it 
is ready to go when I am, and it is incredibly stable. Maintenance has been 
minor. The occasional trouble-shooting has been straightforward. Support, which 
is done through a company called CE Elantech, has been outstanding.

I do not recommend the LECO unless you are running it continuously. It takes a 
very long time to stabilize after it's been sitting cold, especially for N.

The Carlo-Erba takes much smaller samples, so sample homogenization is 
critical. If you go that route, make sure you have a ball mill to process your 
samples.

Rick Boyce

We will be purchasing a CHN analyzer soon. I am looking for advice on product 
performance and service. Please let me know if you are satisfied with your 
model/service or if you have experienced issues with them. I am currently 
considering a Leco and Perkin Elmer model but am open to other suggestions as 
well. Thanks! Amy Anne Erickson, Ph.D. Associate Professor, Department of 
Biological Sciences Harman and Renae Chandler Professorship for the Masters in 
Biological Sciences School of Mathematics and Sciences Scholarship Committee 
Chair Louisiana State University Shreveport One University Place Shreveport, LA 
71115 Phone: 318 797 5105 Fax: 318 797 5222 Email: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

================================
Richard L. Boyce, Ph.D.
Professor and Faculty Regent
Department of Biological Sciences, SC 150
Northern Kentucky University
Nunn Drive
Highland Heights, KY  41099  USA

859-572-1407 (tel.)
859-572-5639 (fax)
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://www.nku.edu/~boycer/
=================================

"One of the advantages of being disorderly is that one is constantly making 
exciting discoveries." - A.A. Milne







Reply via email to