I now have a Thermo EA1112 (really a Carlo-Erba) CHN analyzer, and I had a LECO 
before I came to my present position.

I highly recommend the Carlo-Erba. I’ve had it for about 7 years, and it is the 
most solid piece of equipment I have in my lab. My use is intermittent, yet it 
is ready to go when I am, and it is incredibly stable. Maintenance has been 
minor. The occasional trouble-shooting has been straightforward. Support, which 
is done through a company called CE Elantech, has been outstanding.

I do not recommend the LECO unless you are running it continuously. It takes a 
very long time to stabilize after it’s been sitting cold, especially for N.

The Carlo-Erba takes much smaller samples, so sample homogenization is 
critical. If you go that route, make sure you have a ball mill to process your 
samples.

Rick Boyce

We will be purchasing a CHN analyzer soon. I am looking for advice on product 
performance and service. Please let me know if you are satisfied with your 
model/service or if you have experienced issues with them. I am currently 
considering a Leco and Perkin Elmer model but am open to other suggestions as 
well. Thanks! Amy Anne Erickson, Ph.D. Associate Professor, Department of 
Biological Sciences Harman and Renae Chandler Professorship for the Masters in 
Biological Sciences School of Mathematics and Sciences Scholarship Committee 
Chair Louisiana State University Shreveport One University Place Shreveport, LA 
71115 Phone: 318 797 5105 Fax: 318 797 5222 Email: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

================================
Richard L. Boyce, Ph.D.
Professor and Faculty Regent
Department of Biological Sciences, SC 150
Northern Kentucky University
Nunn Drive
Highland Heights, KY  41099  USA

859-572-1407 (tel.)
859-572-5639 (fax)
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://www.nku.edu/~boycer/
=================================

"One of the advantages of being disorderly is that one is constantly making 
exciting discoveries." - A.A. Milne







Reply via email to