This patch fixes the issue reported by checkpatch:

CHECK: usleep_range is preferred over udelay;
see Documentation/timers/timers-howto.txt

It's save to sleep here instead of using busy waiting,
because we are not in an atomic context.

Signed-off-by: Lukas Schneider <lukas.s.schnei...@fau.de>
Signed-off-by: Jannik Moritz <jannik.mor...@fau.de>
Cc: <linux-ker...@i4.cs.fau.de>
---
 drivers/staging/rts5208/ms.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rts5208/ms.c b/drivers/staging/rts5208/ms.c
index 1128eec3bd08..264887d8b3e6 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rts5208/ms.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rts5208/ms.c
@@ -3237,7 +3237,7 @@ static int ms_write_multiple_pages(struct rtsx_chip 
*chip, u16 old_blk,
                        return STATUS_FAIL;
                }
 
-               udelay(30);
+               usleep_range(30, 40);
 
                rtsx_init_cmd(chip);
 
@@ -4159,7 +4159,7 @@ int mg_set_ICV(struct scsi_cmnd *srb, struct rtsx_chip 
*chip)
 
 #ifdef MG_SET_ICV_SLOW
        for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
-               udelay(50);
+               usleep_range(50, 60);
 
                rtsx_init_cmd(chip);
 
-- 
2.19.1

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to