Fix all checkpatch reported issues for "CHECK: Prefer using '"%s...",
__func__' to using '<func_name>', ..."

Use recommended style. Additionally, __func__ was already used in
similar cases throughout the code, so make it all consistent.

Signed-off-by: Ricardo Silva <rjpdasi...@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/media/lirc/lirc_zilog.c | 9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/lirc/lirc_zilog.c 
b/drivers/staging/media/lirc/lirc_zilog.c
index b33a2c820dc2..99b5858124e0 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/media/lirc/lirc_zilog.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/media/lirc/lirc_zilog.c
@@ -1212,7 +1212,7 @@ static unsigned int poll(struct file *filep, poll_table 
*wait)
        struct lirc_buffer *rbuf = ir->l.rbuf;
        unsigned int ret;
 
-       dev_dbg(ir->l.dev, "poll called\n");
+       dev_dbg(ir->l.dev, "%s called\n", __func__);
 
        rx = get_ir_rx(ir);
        if (!rx) {
@@ -1220,7 +1220,7 @@ static unsigned int poll(struct file *filep, poll_table 
*wait)
                 * Revisit this, if our poll function ever reports writeable
                 * status for Tx
                 */
-               dev_dbg(ir->l.dev, "poll result = POLLERR\n");
+               dev_dbg(ir->l.dev, "%s result = POLLERR\n", __func__);
                return POLLERR;
        }
 
@@ -1233,7 +1233,7 @@ static unsigned int poll(struct file *filep, poll_table 
*wait)
        /* Indicate what ops could happen immediately without blocking */
        ret = lirc_buffer_empty(rbuf) ? 0 : (POLLIN | POLLRDNORM);
 
-       dev_dbg(ir->l.dev, "poll result = %s\n",
+       dev_dbg(ir->l.dev, "%s result = %s\n", __func__,
                ret ? "POLLIN|POLLRDNORM" : "none");
        return ret;
 }
@@ -1341,7 +1341,8 @@ static int close(struct inode *node, struct file *filep)
        struct IR *ir = filep->private_data;
 
        if (!ir) {
-               pr_err("ir: close: no private_data attached to the file!\n");
+               pr_err("ir: %s: no private_data attached to the file!\n",
+                      __func__);
                return -ENODEV;
        }
 
-- 
2.12.2

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to