Fix all checkpatch reported issues for "CHECK: Prefer
kzalloc(sizeof(*<p>)...) over kzalloc(sizeof(struct <P>)...)".

Other similar case in the code already using recommended style, so make
it all consistent with the recommended practice.

Signed-off-by: Ricardo Silva <rjpdasi...@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/media/lirc/lirc_zilog.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/lirc/lirc_zilog.c 
b/drivers/staging/media/lirc/lirc_zilog.c
index 99b5858124e0..7e36693b66a8 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/media/lirc/lirc_zilog.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/media/lirc/lirc_zilog.c
@@ -1474,7 +1474,7 @@ static int ir_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const 
struct i2c_device_id *id)
        /* Use a single struct IR instance for both the Rx and Tx functions */
        ir = get_ir_device_by_adapter(adap);
        if (!ir) {
-               ir = kzalloc(sizeof(struct IR), GFP_KERNEL);
+               ir = kzalloc(sizeof(*ir), GFP_KERNEL);
                if (!ir) {
                        ret = -ENOMEM;
                        goto out_no_ir;
@@ -1514,7 +1514,7 @@ static int ir_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const 
struct i2c_device_id *id)
                rx = get_ir_rx(ir);
 
                /* Set up a struct IR_tx instance */
-               tx = kzalloc(sizeof(struct IR_tx), GFP_KERNEL);
+               tx = kzalloc(sizeof(*tx), GFP_KERNEL);
                if (!tx) {
                        ret = -ENOMEM;
                        goto out_put_xx;
@@ -1558,7 +1558,7 @@ static int ir_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const 
struct i2c_device_id *id)
                tx = get_ir_tx(ir);
 
                /* Set up a struct IR_rx instance */
-               rx = kzalloc(sizeof(struct IR_rx), GFP_KERNEL);
+               rx = kzalloc(sizeof(*rx), GFP_KERNEL);
                if (!rx) {
                        ret = -ENOMEM;
                        goto out_put_xx;
-- 
2.12.2

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to