On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 01:46:09PM -0600, Jason Hrycay wrote: > On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 02:54:37PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 02:49:27PM -0600, Jason Hrycay wrote: > > > Add sanity checks for cport_quiesce and cport_clear before invoking the > > > callbacks as these function pointers are not required during the host > > > device registration. This follows the logic implemented elsewhere for > > > various other function pointers. > > > > Yeah, I allowed for some inconsistency here given that these callbacks > > are mandatory on our current platform. > > > > No harm in checking this way though (well, at least as long as we > > remember to set the pointers). > > > > OK, makes sense. We ran into it while integrating the Motorola > host-device stack into the latest version of greybus (we were > previously forked from a version a year ago - wow time flies).
Cool. Yeah, things changed quite a bit over the last year. Just let us know if you have any questions. Johan _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
