On Mon, 2014-12-15 at 18:53 -0200, Eduardo Barretto wrote:
> Thank you for the quick feedback.
> It was my first patch to the kernel and I wanted to be sure it would get
> right to the community.
> I'll be making a version two with the consideration you brought me.
the code today is:
{
switch (prdcode) {
case [...]
return 1;
default:
if (prdcode < 0x1000) {
printk(msg1);
return 1;
else
printk(msg2);
return 0;
}
return 0; /* avoid compiler noise */
}
I think this code does not needs changing.
I think more modern compilers don't even warn
when the last return 0; isn't there.
If it were to be changed, I'd probably write it like:
{
switch (prdcode) {
case [...]
return 1;
default:
if (prdcode < 0x1000) {
printk(msg1);
return 1;
}
break;
}
printk(msg2);
return 0;
}
but I wouldn't bother.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
