Thank you for the quick feedback.
It was my first patch to the kernel and I wanted to be sure it would get right
to the community.
I'll be making a version two with the consideration you brought me.
Thank you again,
Best regards,
Eduardo Barretto
On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 06:11:30PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-12-15 at 00:02 -0200, Eduardo Barretto wrote:
> > Fixed a coding style issue
> []
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/hfa384x_usb.c
> > b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/hfa384x_usb.c
> []
> > @@ -4123,12 +4123,11 @@ static int hfa384x_isgood_pdrcode(u16 pdrcode)
> > pr_debug("Encountered unknown PDR#=0x%04x, assuming
> > it's ok.\n",
> > pdrcode);
> > return 1;
> > - } else {
> > - /* bad code */
> > - pr_debug("Encountered unknown PDR#=0x%04x, (>=0x1000),
> > assuming it's bad.\n",
> > - pdrcode);
> > - return 0;
> > }
> > + /* bad code */
> > + pr_debug("Encountered unknown PDR#=0x%04x, (>=0x1000), assuming
> > it's bad.\n",
> > + pdrcode);
> > + return 0;
> > }
> > return 0; /* avoid compiler warnings */
> > }
>
> While this patch isn't necessary, if any change is
> done, it might better to not have two consecutive
> return 0; uses.
>
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
