On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 3:20 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> wrote: > We should clear this bit presumably on switching either from or to 512-char > mode, since the bit doesn't really make sense either way.
Yeah the only problem going from 512-char is that chars above 256 will morph into garbage chars below 256, like ctrl chars, I don't really want to face into doing some sort of safe translation out of 512-char mode, from reading around the net, 512 char mode doesn't seem all that brilliantly useful. Dave.
