On 04.06.2012 21:54, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > In i915-land we're trying to make things Just Work. If needed we can > expose (generation/platform-specific) tunables in sysfs. But on snb and > later the combination of rc6+gpu turbo (mostly handled all by hw) is > rather ok, so I don't see anything going above and beyond a min/max > frequency limiter: Moving the min upwards would help for benchmarking, > pushing the max doin might help conserver power for sucky let's eat > everything gpu workloads. > -Daniel Thanks Daniel. No wonders why Intel IGPs are so power efficient :)
- [PATCH] radeon: Make PM info available to all, not just debu... Lauri Kasanen
- [PATCH] radeon: Make PM info available to all, not just debu... Jerome Glisse
- [PATCH] radeon: Make PM info available to all, not just debu... Lauri Kasanen
- [PATCH] radeon: Make PM info available to all, not just debu... Martin Peres
- [PATCH] radeon: Make PM info available to all, not just debu... Jerome Glisse
- [PATCH] radeon: Make PM info available to all, not just debu... Martin Peres
- [PATCH] radeon: Make PM info available to all, not just debu... Jerome Glisse
- [PATCH] radeon: Make PM info available to all, not just debu... Jerome Glisse
- [PATCH] radeon: Make PM info available to all, not just debu... Martin Peres
- [PATCH] radeon: Make PM info available to all, not just debu... Daniel Vetter
- [PATCH] radeon: Make PM info available to all, not just debu... Martin Peres