On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Andy Whitcroft <apw at canonical.com> wrote:
> We have been carrying a (rather poor) patch for an issue we identified in
> the DRM driver. ?This issue is triggered when a DRM device is initialising
> and userspace attempts to open it, typically in response to the sysfs
> device added event. ?Basically we allocate the minor numbers making
> the device available, and then call the drm load callback. ?Until this
> completes the device is really not ready and these early opens typically
> lead to oopses.
>
> We have been using the following patch to avoid this by marking the minors
> as in error until the load method has completed. ?This avoids the early
> open by simply erroring out the opens with EAGAIN. ?Obviously we should
> be delaying the open until the load method complete.
>
> I include the existing patch for completness (it is not really ready for
> merging) to illustrate the issue. ?I think it is logical that the wait
> should simply be delayed until the load has completed. ?I am proposing
> to include a wait queue associated with the idr cache for the drm minors
> which we can use to allow open callers to wait_event_interruptible() on.
> I'll be putting together a prototype shortly and will follow up with it.
>
> Thoughts?

I've just revisited this, maybe I'm going insane but why does
drm_global_mutex not stop this?

drm_get_pci_dev takes drm_global_mutex before calling drm_fill_in_dev
and drm_get_minor.

Now the fops should be pointing at stub_open at this point, as we
won't have switched to the per device fops yet,
and one of the first things drm_stub_open does is take the
drm_global_mutex before doing the idr lookup.

So is the problem opening some sysfs or proc file early?

Dave.


>
> -apw
>
> Andy Whitcroft (1):
> ?drm -- stop early access to drm devices
>
> ?drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c ? ? | ? ?8 ++++++--
> ?drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pci.c ? ? ?| ? ?4 ++++
> ?drivers/gpu/drm/drm_platform.c | ? ?4 ++++
> ?drivers/gpu/drm/drm_stub.c ? ? | ? ?2 +-
> ?4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at ?http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at ?http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to