On Thu, Jul 09, 2026 at 10:45:27AM +0530, Tauro, Riana wrote: > On 09-07-2026 01:51, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 07, 2026 at 12:02:11PM +0530, Tauro, Riana wrote: > > > Hi Rodrigo/Jakub/Aravind > > > > > > Please let me know if you have any feedback for this patch or can you > > > please > > > ack this if it looks good to you. > > I looks good to me, but could you please double check the sashiko's > > comments? > > Sashiko has a comment regarding namespaces > > [Severity: Medium]Since the generic netlink family explicitly supports > multiple networknamespaces by setting .netnsok = true, > will hardcoding init_net hereprevent listeners in non-init namespaces from > receiving error events > > .netnsok = true is auto generated not explicitly added in code.
Because that's what ynl_gen_c.py does without it being parsed from anywhere. > But from what i see, drm device is present in the host and not replicated > across namespaces > and most of the non-network implementations use inet. (ex: Binder) > If this really needs a fix, we can drop the has_listeners suggested by raag > in previous patch. > I don't think in an error path, allocating a new buffer would be a big > overhead if listeners are not present. I don't know enough about namespaces to comment on this. I'll rely on Jakub's disposition if netnsok is relevant here, or needed at all for our usecase. Raag
