On Thu, Apr 02, 2026 at 02:04:28PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2026 at 01:34:14PM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
> > DP v2.1 SCR advertises support for FAVT payload fields parsing in DPCD
> > 0x2214 Bit 2. This indicates the support for Adaptive-Sync SDP version 2
> > (AS SDP v2), which allows the source to set the version in HB2[4:0] and the
> > payload length in HB3[5:0] of the AS SDP header.
> > 
> > DP v2.1 SCR also introduces ASYNC_VIDEO_TIMING_NOT_SUPPORTED_IN_PR in the
> > Panel Replay Capability DPCD 0x00b1 (Bit 3). When this bit is set, the sink
> > does not support asynchronous video timing while in a Panel Replay Active
> > state and the source is required to keep transmitting Adaptive-Sync
> > SDPs. The spec mandates that such sinks shall support AS SDP v2.
> > 
> > Infer AS SDP v2 support from these capabilities and store it in
> > struct intel_dp for use by subsequent feature enablement changes.
> 
> Hmm. After some more reading I think we might actually want to consult
> the DisplayID for this. The presence of the new adaptive sync block
> there might be a good indication for AS SDP v2 support. While the
> DisplayID 2.1 spec itself doesn't say that AS SDP v2 must be supported
> when the block is present, the DP 2.1 spec does at least say the converse.
> Ie. adaptive sync capable DP 2.1 sink must have the DisplayID block. And
> DP 2.1 seems to be all about the AS SDP v2 and not AS SDP v1 (that's a DP
> 2.0 thing really).

Hmm. But the EDID comes from the display, and we could have a PCON
in between that doesn't understand AS SDP v2. Sigh. What a mess.

> 
> I think there was a patch posted very recently on dri-devel, adding the
> adaptive sync DisplayID block parsing. Or at least some DisplayID block
> related to this.
> 
> The intel_psr_pr_async_video_timing_supported() check I think we want
> to keep regardless, because you could have a sink with PR but no
> adaptive sync. But the FAVT check could perhaps be dropped if we add 
> the DisplayID check.
> 
> > 
> > v2: Include parsing ASYNC_VIDEO_TIMING_NOT_SUPPORTED_IN_PR bit to
> >     determine AS SDP v2 support. (Ville)
> > v3: Use helper to determine asynch video timing support.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h    |  1 +
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c       | 33 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 34 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h 
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > index e2496db1642a..efc609eef4f5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > @@ -1870,6 +1870,7 @@ struct intel_dp {
> >     /* connector directly attached - won't be use for modeset in mst world 
> > */
> >     struct intel_connector *attached_connector;
> >     bool as_sdp_supported;
> > +   bool as_sdp_v2_supported;
> >  
> >     struct drm_dp_tunnel *tunnel;
> >     bool tunnel_suspended:1;
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c 
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > index cec0f3d03c2f..9fd768447f28 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > @@ -6306,6 +6306,36 @@ intel_dp_unset_edid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> >                                            false);
> >  }
> >  
> > +static bool
> > +intel_dp_sink_supports_as_sdp_v2(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > +{
> > +   u8 rx_features;
> > +
> > +   /*
> > +    * The DP spec does not explicitly provide the AS SDP v2 capability.
> > +    * So based on the DP v2.1 SCR, we infer it from the following bits:
> > +    *
> > +    * DP_AS_SDP_FAVT_PAYLOAD_FIELDS_PARSING_SUPPORTED indicates support for
> > +    * FAVT, which is explicitly defined to use AS SDP v2.
> > +    *
> > +    * DP_ASYNC_VIDEO_TIMING_NOT_SUPPORTED_IN_PR indicates that the sink
> > +    * does not support asynchronous video timing while in PR Active,
> > +    * requiring the source to keep transmitting Adaptive-Sync SDPs. The
> > +    * spec mandates that such sinks shall support AS SDP v2.
> > +    */
> > +   if (drm_dp_dpcd_read_byte(&intel_dp->aux,
> > +                             DP_DPRX_FEATURE_ENUMERATION_LIST_CONT_1,
> > +                             &rx_features) == 1) {
> > +           if (rx_features & 
> > DP_AS_SDP_FAVT_PAYLOAD_FIELDS_PARSING_SUPPORTED)
> > +                   return true;
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   if (!intel_psr_pr_async_video_timing_supported(intel_dp))
> > +           return true;
> > +
> > +   return false;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void
> >  intel_dp_detect_sdp_caps(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> >  {
> > @@ -6313,6 +6343,9 @@ intel_dp_detect_sdp_caps(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> >  
> >     intel_dp->as_sdp_supported = HAS_AS_SDP(display) &&
> >             drm_dp_as_sdp_supported(&intel_dp->aux, intel_dp->dpcd);
> > +
> > +   intel_dp->as_sdp_v2_supported = intel_dp->as_sdp_supported &&
> > +                                   
> > intel_dp_sink_supports_as_sdp_v2(intel_dp);
> >  }
> >  
> >  static bool intel_dp_needs_dpcd_probe(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, bool 
> > force_on_external)
> > -- 
> > 2.45.2
> 
> -- 
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

Reply via email to