On 9/8/2025 8:48 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 9/8/25 10:26 AM, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
>> A7XX_GEN2 generation has additional TCS slots. Poll the respective
>> DRV status registers before pm suspend.
>>
>> Fixes: 1f8c29e80066 ("drm/msm/a6xx: Add A740 support")
>> Signed-off-by: Akhil P Oommen <akhi...@oss.qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
>> index 
>> bb30b11175737e04d4bfd6bfa5470d6365c520fa..06870f6596a7cb045deecaff3c95fba32ee84d52
>>  100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
>> @@ -987,6 +987,22 @@ static void a6xx_gmu_rpmh_off(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu)
>>              val, (val & 1), 100, 10000);
>>      gmu_poll_timeout_rscc(gmu, REG_A6XX_RSCC_TCS3_DRV0_STATUS + seqmem_off,
>>              val, (val & 1), 100, 1000);
>> +
>> +    if (!adreno_is_a740_family(adreno_gpu))
>> +            return;
>> +
>> +    gmu_poll_timeout_rscc(gmu, REG_A7XX_RSCC_TCS4_DRV0_STATUS + seqmem_off,
>> +            val, (val & 1), 100, 10000);
>> +    gmu_poll_timeout_rscc(gmu, REG_A7XX_RSCC_TCS5_DRV0_STATUS + seqmem_off,
>> +            val, (val & 1), 100, 10000);
>> +    gmu_poll_timeout_rscc(gmu, REG_A7XX_RSCC_TCS6_DRV0_STATUS + seqmem_off,
>> +            val, (val & 1), 100, 10000);
>> +    gmu_poll_timeout_rscc(gmu, REG_A7XX_RSCC_TCS7_DRV0_STATUS + seqmem_off,
>> +            val, (val & 1), 100, 1000);
>> +    gmu_poll_timeout_rscc(gmu, REG_A7XX_RSCC_TCS8_DRV0_STATUS + seqmem_off,
>> +            val, (val & 1), 100, 10000);
>> +    gmu_poll_timeout_rscc(gmu, REG_A7XX_RSCC_TCS9_DRV0_STATUS + seqmem_off,
>> +            val, (val & 1), 100, 1000);
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/002eb889-87cb-4b8c-98fb-6826c6977...@oss.qualcomm.com/

I missed the timeout value update. It is not bad since we already have
the same value for TCS3 above. Will fix them all separately.

-Akhil.

> 
> Konrad

Reply via email to