On 09-08-2025 18:16, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
On Thu Aug 7, 2025 at 6:43 PM CEST, Himal Prasad Ghimiray wrote:
This change adds support for passing flags to drm_gpuvm_sm_map() and
sm_map_ops_create(), enabling future extensions that affect split/merge
logic in drm_gpuvm.
v2
- Move flag to drm_gpuvm_map_req
Cc: Danilo Krummrich <d...@kernel.org>
Cc: Boris Brezillon <bbrezil...@kernel.org>
Cc: Caterina Shablia <caterina.shab...@collabora.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.br...@intel.com>
Cc: <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Signed-off-by: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimi...@intel.com>
---
include/drm/drm_gpuvm.h | 12 ++++++++++++
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_gpuvm.h b/include/drm/drm_gpuvm.h
index cbb9b6519462..116f77abd570 100644
--- a/include/drm/drm_gpuvm.h
+++ b/include/drm/drm_gpuvm.h
@@ -1049,6 +1049,13 @@ struct drm_gpuva_ops {
*/
#define drm_gpuva_next_op(op) list_next_entry(op, entry)
+enum drm_gpuvm_sm_map_ops_flags {
Please also add a doc-comment for the enum type itself, explaing where those
flags are used, etc.
sure will do.
+ /**
+ * %DRM_GPUVM_SM_MAP_OPS_FLAG_NONE: DEFAULT sm_map ops
Shouldn't this be '@DRM_GPUVM_SM_MAP_OPS_FLAG_NONE:'?
Yup. will change in next version.
+ */
+ DRM_GPUVM_SM_MAP_OPS_FLAG_NONE = 0,
+};
