On 08/06/2025, Luca Ceresoli wrote: > On Wed, 6 Aug 2025 17:38:17 +0800 > Liu Ying <victor....@nxp.com> wrote: > >> On 08/06/2025, Luca Ceresoli wrote: >>> Hello Liu, >>> >>> On Wed, 6 Aug 2025 16:54:24 +0800 >>> Liu Ying <victor....@nxp.com> wrote: >>> >>>> devm_drm_bridge_alloc() returns ERR_PTR on failure instead of a >>>> NULL pointer, so use IS_ERR() to check the returned pointer. >>>> >>>> Fixes: 48f05c3b4b70 ("drm/bridge: analogix_dp: Use devm_drm_bridge_alloc() >>>> API") >>>> Signed-off-by: Liu Ying <victor....@nxp.com> >>>> --- >>>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c | 2 +- >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c >>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c >>>> index ed35e567d117..86cf898a09bb 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c >>>> @@ -1474,7 +1474,7 @@ analogix_dp_probe(struct device *dev, struct >>>> analogix_dp_plat_data *plat_data) >>>> >>>> dp = devm_drm_bridge_alloc(dev, struct analogix_dp_device, bridge, >>>> &analogix_dp_bridge_funcs); >>>> - if (!dp) >>>> + if (IS_ERR(dp)) >>>> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); >>> >>> Good catch, thanks! >>> >>> You fix is correct but now I realized one additional fix is needed in >>> the following line: >>> >>> - return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); >>> + return ERR_PTR(dp); >> >> You mean ERR_CAST(dp)? > > Ah, indeed! > >>> Can you send a v2 with that fixed? >> >> I find devm_drm_bridge_alloc() always returns ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM) in this >> driver context, so it seems fine to keep the existing ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM). >> If you prefer ERR_CAST(dp), I may send v2 to use ERR_CAST(dp). > > The documentation says: > > * Returns: > * Pointer to new bridge, or ERR_PTR on failure. > > So let's follow that, which is a (relatively) immutable contract, and > not the implementation which might change over time.
Fair enough. v2 is on the way. > > This is also what all callers of devm_drm_bridge_alloc() do, unless I > missed something. > > Thanks, > Luca > -- Regards, Liu Ying