On 08/06/2025, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> Hello Liu,
>
> On Wed, 6 Aug 2025 16:54:24 +0800
> Liu Ying <victor....@nxp.com> wrote:
>
>> devm_drm_bridge_alloc() returns ERR_PTR on failure instead of a
>> NULL pointer, so use IS_ERR() to check the returned pointer.
>>
>> Fixes: 48f05c3b4b70 ("drm/bridge: analogix_dp: Use devm_drm_bridge_alloc()
>> API")
>> Signed-off-by: Liu Ying <victor....@nxp.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
>> index ed35e567d117..86cf898a09bb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
>> @@ -1474,7 +1474,7 @@ analogix_dp_probe(struct device *dev, struct
>> analogix_dp_plat_data *plat_data)
>>
>> dp = devm_drm_bridge_alloc(dev, struct analogix_dp_device, bridge,
>> &analogix_dp_bridge_funcs);
>> - if (!dp)
>> + if (IS_ERR(dp))
>> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>
> Good catch, thanks!
>
> You fix is correct but now I realized one additional fix is needed in
> the following line:
>
> - return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> + return ERR_PTR(dp);
You mean ERR_CAST(dp)?
>
> Can you send a v2 with that fixed?
I find devm_drm_bridge_alloc() always returns ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM) in this
driver context, so it seems fine to keep the existing ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM).
If you prefer ERR_CAST(dp), I may send v2 to use ERR_CAST(dp).
>
> Luca
>
--
Regards,
Liu Ying
