From: Dave Airlie <airl...@redhat.com>

Currently you can't see per-device numa aware pools properly.

Cc: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airl...@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c | 9 +++++++--
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c
index ccc3b9a13e9e..43b69d061dff 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c
@@ -1253,7 +1253,7 @@ int ttm_pool_debugfs(struct ttm_pool *pool, struct 
seq_file *m)
 {
        unsigned int i;
 
-       if (!pool->use_dma_alloc) {
+       if (!pool->use_dma_alloc && pool->nid == NUMA_NO_NODE) {
                seq_puts(m, "unused\n");
                return 0;
        }
@@ -1262,7 +1262,12 @@ int ttm_pool_debugfs(struct ttm_pool *pool, struct 
seq_file *m)
 
        spin_lock(&shrinker_lock);
        for (i = 0; i < TTM_NUM_CACHING_TYPES; ++i) {
-               seq_puts(m, "DMA ");
+               if (!ttm_pool_select_type(pool, i, 0))
+                       continue;
+               if (pool->use_dma_alloc)
+                       seq_puts(m, "DMA ");
+               else
+                       seq_printf(m, "N%d ", pool->nid);
                switch (i) {
                case ttm_cached:
                        seq_puts(m, "\t:");
-- 
2.43.5

Reply via email to