On 20/05/2025 23:23, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: >> >> There is no checkpatch --strict warning here exactly for the reason I >> was saying. For readability there should be no empty line after because >> such statements are expected to be together. I don't mind of course >> adding one, so I will implement the change. > > I'd prefer this: > > u32 data; > > data = readl(); > data &= foo;;
Ah, ok, I understand now. Best regards, Krzysztof
