Hello Manikandan,

On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 09:42:16 +0000
<manikanda...@microchip.com> wrote:

[...]

> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c 
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c
> > index 
> > 1d4ae0097df847d9f93c79eecff0c4587ae331ba..9f4ff82bc6b49010f8727da3b367f5a744a28edc
> >  100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c
> > @@ -157,9 +157,10 @@ static int mchp_lvds_probe(struct platform_device 
> > *pdev)
> >          if (!dev->of_node)
> >                  return -ENODEV;
> > 
> > -       lvds = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*lvds), GFP_KERNEL);
> > -       if (!lvds)
> > -               return -ENOMEM;
> > +       lvds = devm_drm_bridge_alloc(&pdev->dev, struct mchp_lvds, bridge,
> > +                                    &mchp_lvds_bridge_funcs);
> > +       if (IS_ERR(lvds))
> > +               return PTR_ERR(lvds);
> > 
> >          lvds->dev = dev;
> > 
> > @@ -192,7 +193,6 @@ static int mchp_lvds_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > 
> >          lvds->bridge.of_node = dev->of_node;
> >          lvds->bridge.type = DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_LVDS;
> > -       lvds->bridge.funcs = &mchp_lvds_bridge_funcs;
> > 
> >          dev_set_drvdata(dev, lvds);
> >          ret = devm_pm_runtime_enable(dev);  
> 
> Reviewed-by: Manikandan Muralidharan <manikanda...@microchip.com>

Thanks for reviewing!

In v3 this patch will be slightly different from v2. See the reply I
just sent to Doug for the details.

If your Reviewed-by tag refers only to the microchip-lvds driver, for
which there will be no change in v3, I think it's correct to take your
tag and add a comment like:

 Reviewed-by: Manikandan Muralidharan <manikanda...@microchip.com> # 
microchip-lvds.c

Anything against this?

Best regards,
Luca

-- 
Luca Ceresoli, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Reply via email to