On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 11:43:45PM +0800, Kuan-Wei Chiu wrote: > Refactor parity calculations to use the standard parity_odd() helper. > This change eliminates redundant implementations. > > Co-developed-by: Yu-Chun Lin <eleanor...@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Yu-Chun Lin <eleanor...@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitor...@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/media/test-drivers/vivid/vivid-vbi-gen.c | 8 ++------ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/media/test-drivers/vivid/vivid-vbi-gen.c > b/drivers/media/test-drivers/vivid/vivid-vbi-gen.c > index 70a4024d461e..5e1b7b1742e4 100644 > --- a/drivers/media/test-drivers/vivid/vivid-vbi-gen.c > +++ b/drivers/media/test-drivers/vivid/vivid-vbi-gen.c > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ > * Copyright 2014 Cisco Systems, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights > reserved. > */ > > +#include <linux/bitops.h> > #include <linux/errno.h> > #include <linux/kernel.h> > #include <linux/ktime.h> > @@ -165,12 +166,7 @@ static const u8 vivid_cc_sequence2[30] = { > > static u8 calc_parity(u8 val) > { > - unsigned i; > - unsigned tot = 0; > - > - for (i = 0; i < 7; i++) > - tot += (val & (1 << i)) ? 1 : 0; > - return val | ((tot & 1) ? 0 : 0x80); > + return val | (parity_odd(val) ? 0 : 0x80);
So, if val == 0 than parity_odd(val) is also 0, and this can be simplified just to: return parity(val) ? 0 : 0x80; Or I miss something? > } > > static void vivid_vbi_gen_set_time_of_day(u8 *packet) > -- > 2.34.1