On 09/04/2025 20:59, Kuan-Wei Chiu wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 08:43:09PM +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>> On 4/9/2025 5:43 PM, Kuan-Wei Chiu wrote:
>>> Refactor parity calculations to use the standard parity_odd() helper.
>>> This change eliminates redundant implementations.
>>>
>>> Co-developed-by: Yu-Chun Lin <eleanor...@gmail.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yu-Chun Lin <eleanor...@gmail.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitor...@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/media/pci/cx18/cx18-av-vbi.c | 12 ++----------
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/cx18/cx18-av-vbi.c
>>> b/drivers/media/pci/cx18/cx18-av-vbi.c
>>> index 65281d40c681..15b515b95956 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/media/pci/cx18/cx18-av-vbi.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/media/pci/cx18/cx18-av-vbi.c
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> @@ -278,7 +270,7 @@ int cx18_av_decode_vbi_line(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
>>> break;
>>> case 6:
>>> sdid = V4L2_SLICED_CAPTION_525;
>>> - err = !odd_parity(p[0]) || !odd_parity(p[1]);
>>> + err = !parity_odd(p[0]) || !parity_odd(p[1]);
>>
>> No need to call parity_odd() twice here. Instead you could do:
>>
>> err = !parity_odd(p[0] ^ p[1]);
I prefer the original approach, it is easier to understand. Performance
is not an issue here, clarity of the code is more important.
So for this patch (i.e. this v4 version):
Reviewed-by: Hans Verkuil <hverk...@xs4all.nl>
>>
>> This is orthogonal to the change to parity_odd() though. More specific to
>> the new parity_odd() you can now do following as parity_odd() argument is
>> u64:
>>
>> err = !parity_odd(*(u16 *)p);
>>
>>
> Thanks for the feedback!
> Would you prefer this change to be part of the parity() conversion
> patch, or in a separate one?
Just leave it as-is, as mentioned above.
Regards,
Hans
>
> Regards,
> Kuan-Wei
