On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 04:52:22PM +0200, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Mar 2025, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 20 Mar 2025, Michał Winiarski wrote:
> > 
> > > Similar to regular resizable BAR, VF BAR can also be resized, e.g. by
> > > the system firmware or the PCI subsystem itself.
> > > 
> > > Add the capability ID and restore it as a part of IOV state.
> > >
> > > See PCIe r4.0, sec 9.3.7.4.
> > 
> > Usually it's best o refer to latest gen doc, the section number seems to 
> > be the same also in r6.2.
> 
> Actually, it isn't. r6.2 9.3.7 does specify capability IDs so I though you 
> be refering to that section, but there's no 9.3.7.4 section at all.

Yeah - I'll change it to refer to r6.2:
"See PCIe r6.2, sec 7.8.7."

> 
> --
>  i.
> 
> > This didn't refer to spec section that specified VF Rebar ext capability
> > (7.8.7) though. I think it should and it would also be good to mention the 
> > capability layout is the same as with the rebar cap.
> > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiar...@intel.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvi...@linux.intel.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/pci/iov.c             | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > >  drivers/pci/pci.h             |  1 +
> > >  include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h |  1 +
> > >  3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/iov.c b/drivers/pci/iov.c
> > > index 121540f57d4bf..bf95387993cd5 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/iov.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/iov.c
> > > @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> > >   * Copyright (C) 2009 Intel Corporation, Yu Zhao <yu.z...@intel.com>
> > >   */
> > >  
> > > +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
> > >  #include <linux/pci.h>
> > >  #include <linux/slab.h>
> > >  #include <linux/export.h>
> > > @@ -830,6 +831,7 @@ static int sriov_init(struct pci_dev *dev, int pos)
> > >   pci_read_config_byte(dev, pos + PCI_SRIOV_FUNC_LINK, &iov->link);
> > >   if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_END)
> > >           iov->link = PCI_DEVFN(PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn), iov->link);
> > > + iov->vf_rebar_cap = pci_find_ext_capability(dev, 
> > > PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_VF_REBAR);
> > >  
> > >   if (pdev)
> > >           iov->dev = pci_dev_get(pdev);
> > > @@ -868,6 +870,30 @@ static void sriov_release(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > >   dev->sriov = NULL;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +static void sriov_restore_vf_rebar_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > > +{
> > > + unsigned int pos, nbars, i;
> > > + u32 ctrl;
> > > +
> > > + pos = dev->sriov->vf_rebar_cap;
> > > + if (!pos)
> > > +         return;
> > > +
> > > + pci_read_config_dword(dev, pos + PCI_REBAR_CTRL, &ctrl);
> > > + nbars = FIELD_GET(PCI_REBAR_CTRL_NBAR_MASK, ctrl);
> > > +
> > > + for (i = 0; i < nbars; i++, pos += 8) {
> > > +         int bar_idx, size;
> > > +
> > > +         pci_read_config_dword(dev, pos + PCI_REBAR_CTRL, &ctrl);
> > > +         bar_idx = FIELD_GET(PCI_REBAR_CTRL_BAR_IDX, ctrl);
> > > +         size = pci_rebar_bytes_to_size(dev->sriov->barsz[bar_idx]);
> > > +         ctrl &= ~PCI_REBAR_CTRL_BAR_SIZE;
> > > +         ctrl |= FIELD_PREP(PCI_REBAR_CTRL_BAR_SIZE, size);
> > > +         pci_write_config_dword(dev, pos + PCI_REBAR_CTRL, ctrl);
> > 
> > I started to wonder if we'd still want to have the VF Rebar ones in 
> > uapi/linux/pci_regs.h (despite the same capability layout):
> > 
> > /*
> >  * PCI Resizable BAR and PCI VF Resizable BAR extended capabilities have 
> >  * the same layout of fields.
> >  */
> > #define PCI_VF_REBAR_CTRL           PCI_REBAR_CTRL
> > #define PCI_VF_REBAR_CTRL_BAR_IDX   PCI_REBAR_CTRL_BAR_IDX
> > etc.
> > 
> > as then it would be possible grep to pick up only the relevant lines.
> > 
> > I'd not duplicate _SHIFT defines though. FIELD_PREP/GET() in general does 
> > not need _SHIFT defines at all and they are just duplicated information.

And I'll also add the defines for VF_REBAR and usage for config space
restore.

Thanks,
-Michał

> > 
> > > + }
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  static void sriov_restore_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > >  {
> > >   int i;
> > > @@ -1027,8 +1053,10 @@ resource_size_t 
> > > pci_sriov_resource_alignment(struct pci_dev *dev, int resno)
> > >   */
> > >  void pci_restore_iov_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > >  {
> > > - if (dev->is_physfn)
> > > + if (dev->is_physfn) {
> > > +         sriov_restore_vf_rebar_state(dev);
> > >           sriov_restore_state(dev);
> > > + }
> > >  }
> > >  
> > >  /**
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.h b/drivers/pci/pci.h
> > > index b81e99cd4b62a..adc54bb2c8b34 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/pci.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.h
> > > @@ -482,6 +482,7 @@ struct pci_sriov {
> > >   u16             subsystem_vendor; /* VF subsystem vendor */
> > >   u16             subsystem_device; /* VF subsystem device */
> > >   resource_size_t barsz[PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS];      /* VF BAR size */
> > > + u16             vf_rebar_cap;   /* VF Resizable BAR capability offset */
> > >   bool            drivers_autoprobe; /* Auto probing of VFs by driver */
> > >  };
> > >  
> > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h b/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
> > > index ba326710f9c8b..bb2a334e50386 100644
> > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
> > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
> > > @@ -745,6 +745,7 @@
> > >  #define PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_L1SS      0x1E    /* L1 PM Substates */
> > >  #define PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_PTM       0x1F    /* Precision Time Measurement */
> > >  #define PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_DVSEC     0x23    /* Designated Vendor-Specific */
> > > +#define PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_VF_REBAR 0x24     /* VF Resizable BAR */
> > >  #define PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_DLF       0x25    /* Data Link Feature */
> > >  #define PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_PL_16GT   0x26    /* Physical Layer 16.0 GT/s */
> > >  #define PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_NPEM      0x29    /* Native PCIe Enclosure 
> > > Management */
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvi...@linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > 

Reply via email to