On Wed, 26 Mar 2025, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:

> On Thu, 20 Mar 2025, Michał Winiarski wrote:
> 
> > Similar to regular resizable BAR, VF BAR can also be resized, e.g. by
> > the system firmware or the PCI subsystem itself.
> > 
> > Add the capability ID and restore it as a part of IOV state.
> >
> > See PCIe r4.0, sec 9.3.7.4.
> 
> Usually it's best o refer to latest gen doc, the section number seems to 
> be the same also in r6.2.

Actually, it isn't. r6.2 9.3.7 does specify capability IDs so I though you 
be refering to that section, but there's no 9.3.7.4 section at all.

--
 i.

> This didn't refer to spec section that specified VF Rebar ext capability
> (7.8.7) though. I think it should and it would also be good to mention the 
> capability layout is the same as with the rebar cap.
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiar...@intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvi...@linux.intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/iov.c             | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  drivers/pci/pci.h             |  1 +
> >  include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h |  1 +
> >  3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/iov.c b/drivers/pci/iov.c
> > index 121540f57d4bf..bf95387993cd5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/iov.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/iov.c
> > @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> >   * Copyright (C) 2009 Intel Corporation, Yu Zhao <yu.z...@intel.com>
> >   */
> >  
> > +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
> >  #include <linux/pci.h>
> >  #include <linux/slab.h>
> >  #include <linux/export.h>
> > @@ -830,6 +831,7 @@ static int sriov_init(struct pci_dev *dev, int pos)
> >     pci_read_config_byte(dev, pos + PCI_SRIOV_FUNC_LINK, &iov->link);
> >     if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_END)
> >             iov->link = PCI_DEVFN(PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn), iov->link);
> > +   iov->vf_rebar_cap = pci_find_ext_capability(dev, 
> > PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_VF_REBAR);
> >  
> >     if (pdev)
> >             iov->dev = pci_dev_get(pdev);
> > @@ -868,6 +870,30 @@ static void sriov_release(struct pci_dev *dev)
> >     dev->sriov = NULL;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static void sriov_restore_vf_rebar_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > +{
> > +   unsigned int pos, nbars, i;
> > +   u32 ctrl;
> > +
> > +   pos = dev->sriov->vf_rebar_cap;
> > +   if (!pos)
> > +           return;
> > +
> > +   pci_read_config_dword(dev, pos + PCI_REBAR_CTRL, &ctrl);
> > +   nbars = FIELD_GET(PCI_REBAR_CTRL_NBAR_MASK, ctrl);
> > +
> > +   for (i = 0; i < nbars; i++, pos += 8) {
> > +           int bar_idx, size;
> > +
> > +           pci_read_config_dword(dev, pos + PCI_REBAR_CTRL, &ctrl);
> > +           bar_idx = FIELD_GET(PCI_REBAR_CTRL_BAR_IDX, ctrl);
> > +           size = pci_rebar_bytes_to_size(dev->sriov->barsz[bar_idx]);
> > +           ctrl &= ~PCI_REBAR_CTRL_BAR_SIZE;
> > +           ctrl |= FIELD_PREP(PCI_REBAR_CTRL_BAR_SIZE, size);
> > +           pci_write_config_dword(dev, pos + PCI_REBAR_CTRL, ctrl);
> 
> I started to wonder if we'd still want to have the VF Rebar ones in 
> uapi/linux/pci_regs.h (despite the same capability layout):
> 
> /*
>  * PCI Resizable BAR and PCI VF Resizable BAR extended capabilities have 
>  * the same layout of fields.
>  */
> #define PCI_VF_REBAR_CTRL             PCI_REBAR_CTRL
> #define PCI_VF_REBAR_CTRL_BAR_IDX     PCI_REBAR_CTRL_BAR_IDX
> etc.
> 
> as then it would be possible grep to pick up only the relevant lines.
> 
> I'd not duplicate _SHIFT defines though. FIELD_PREP/GET() in general does 
> not need _SHIFT defines at all and they are just duplicated information.
> 
> > +   }
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void sriov_restore_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
> >  {
> >     int i;
> > @@ -1027,8 +1053,10 @@ resource_size_t pci_sriov_resource_alignment(struct 
> > pci_dev *dev, int resno)
> >   */
> >  void pci_restore_iov_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
> >  {
> > -   if (dev->is_physfn)
> > +   if (dev->is_physfn) {
> > +           sriov_restore_vf_rebar_state(dev);
> >             sriov_restore_state(dev);
> > +   }
> >  }
> >  
> >  /**
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.h b/drivers/pci/pci.h
> > index b81e99cd4b62a..adc54bb2c8b34 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/pci.h
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.h
> > @@ -482,6 +482,7 @@ struct pci_sriov {
> >     u16             subsystem_vendor; /* VF subsystem vendor */
> >     u16             subsystem_device; /* VF subsystem device */
> >     resource_size_t barsz[PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS];      /* VF BAR size */
> > +   u16             vf_rebar_cap;   /* VF Resizable BAR capability offset */
> >     bool            drivers_autoprobe; /* Auto probing of VFs by driver */
> >  };
> >  
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h b/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
> > index ba326710f9c8b..bb2a334e50386 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
> > @@ -745,6 +745,7 @@
> >  #define PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_L1SS        0x1E    /* L1 PM Substates */
> >  #define PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_PTM 0x1F    /* Precision Time Measurement */
> >  #define PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_DVSEC       0x23    /* Designated Vendor-Specific */
> > +#define PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_VF_REBAR 0x24       /* VF Resizable BAR */
> >  #define PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_DLF 0x25    /* Data Link Feature */
> >  #define PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_PL_16GT     0x26    /* Physical Layer 16.0 GT/s */
> >  #define PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_NPEM        0x29    /* Native PCIe Enclosure 
> > Management */
> 
> Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvi...@linux.intel.com>
> 
> 

Reply via email to