On 3/17/25 6:44 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Use new SoC-specific compatible to the SPS SIC in addition to the
> "syscon" compatible and rename the node to follow the purpose of it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.barysh...@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-apq8064.dtsi | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-apq8064.dtsi
> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-apq8064.dtsi
> index
> 522387700fc8ce854c0995636998d2d4237e33df..a106f9f984fcb51dea1fff1515e6f290b36ccf99
> 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-apq8064.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-apq8064.dtsi
> @@ -402,8 +402,8 @@ saw3_vreg: regulator {
> };
> };
>
> - sps_sic_non_secure: sps-sic-non-secure@12100000 {
> - compatible = "syscon";
> + sps_sic_non_secure: interrupt-controller@12100000 {
The register that the consumer of this points to doesn't seem to exist..
Konrad
