On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 10:20 AM Doug Anderson <diand...@chromium.org>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 9:47 PM Anusha Srivatsa <asriv...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > @@ -181,24 +162,15 @@ static int r63353_panel_prepare(struct drm_panel
> *panel)
> > static int r63353_panel_deactivate(struct r63353_panel *rpanel)
> > {
> > struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = rpanel->dsi;
> > - struct device *dev = &dsi->dev;
> > - int ret;
> > + struct mipi_dsi_multi_context dsi_ctx = { .dsi = dsi };
> >
> > - ret = mipi_dsi_dcs_set_display_off(dsi);
> > - if (ret < 0) {
> > - dev_err(dev, "Failed to set display OFF (%d)\n", ret);
> > - return ret;
> > - }
> > + mipi_dsi_dcs_set_display_off_multi(&dsi_ctx);
> >
> > - usleep_range(5000, 10000);
> > + mipi_dsi_usleep_range(&dsi_ctx, 5000, 10000);
> >
> > - ret = mipi_dsi_dcs_enter_sleep_mode(dsi);
> > - if (ret < 0) {
> > - dev_err(dev, "Failed to enter sleep mode (%d)\n", ret);
> > - return ret;
> > - }
> > + mipi_dsi_dcs_enter_sleep_mode_multi(&dsi_ctx);
> >
> > - return 0;
> > + return dsi_ctx.accum_err;
>
> nit: the one caller of r63353_panel_deactivate() doesn't actually look
> at the error code, so this could be a function that returns "void".
> That was true even before your patch, though. I wouldn't mind a
> followup patch that fixed this. ;-)
>
>
This is anyway not merged, Maybe better to fix right now instead of a
follow up patch?
In any case, the patch looks reasonable to me now.
>
> Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <diand...@chromium.org>
>
Thanks :)
Anusha
>
> Happy for someone else to apply it if they want. If not, I'll snooze
> this for ~a week to give others a chance to comment and then plan to
> push to drm-misc-next.
>
> -Doug
>
>
