On 2024-08-07 21:23, Joshua Ashton wrote: > I was thinking about this more recently. I was initially considering "maybe > this should be a per-BO import," but I couldn't think of anything in the GL > model that would actually benefit given its not "true" bindless and there's > no update-after-bind there. > > Worth others more familiar with GL asking that question to themselves also. I > am definitely not totally up on what's possible there. > > Overall, I think I am OK with this approach, even though I think mixing > implicit and explicit sync is gross, and I want the pain that is implicit > sync to just go away forever. :-)
It can never go away, at least not in the drivers which have ever supported it. We can never break compatibility. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer \ GNOME / Xwayland / Mesa developer https://redhat.com \ Libre software enthusiast
