On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 11:00:44AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > >> >> > >> > > >> > I just tried with Ubuntu 10.04 (kernel 2.6.32) and it fails in a similar > >> > way than F13 (kernel 2.6.33) does. > >> > > >> > To summarize: > >> > ? ? ? ?- Booting the laptop in the dock, both the internal laptop > >> > display and the external DVI display connected, > >> > ? ? ? ? ?shows the beginning of the boot process on the internal display > >> > and then both displays go blank. > >> > > >> > ? ? ? ?- Booting the laptop in the dock, internal display in use and the > >> > external display powered *off*, > >> > ? ? ? ? ?shows the kernel boot process on the internal display but when > >> > GDM should show up the internal display goes blank. > >> > ? ? ? ? ?Nothing on the external display either (if I power it on). > >> > > >> > ? ? ? ?- Booting the laptop without the dock (and without the external > >> > display) works OK, I can see kernel boot process and GDM/X just OK. > >> > > >> > ? ? ? ?- Booting the laptop without the dock, and attaching it to the > >> > dock after X is running allows me to use (=enable) the external display > >> > once. > >> > ? ? ? ? ?But Gnome Monitor application shows the external display twice > >> > (as two devices).. > >> > > >> > >> Does it work if you boot with the laptop in the dock and then after it > >> boots attach the external monitor and enable it? ?Do things work any > >> better if you use xrandr rather than the gnome displays tool? > >> > > > > I just shutdown the laptop, connected it to the dock, > > disconnected the DVI cable from the dock, and then powered on the laptop. > > Now the boot process was OK using the laptop internal display.. gdm and X > > showed up on the internal display OK. > > > > When I was in X I connected the DVI cable to the dock, and went to gnome > > Monitors application. Same thing - the external display is shown as > > two separate devices. Although they don't work - no matter which one > > of the external displays I choose I don't get picture on the external DVI > > display. > > > > I also tried with xrandr: > > > > $ xrandr > > Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1680 x 1050, maximum 8192 x 8192 > > VGA-0 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) > > LVDS connected 1680x1050+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 0mm > > x 0mm > > ? 1680x1050 ? ? ?60.0*+ > > ? 1400x1050 ? ? ?60.0 ? ? 60.0 > > ? 1280x1024 ? ? ?59.9 ? ? 60.0 > > ? 1440x900 ? ? ? 59.9 > > ? 1280x960 ? ? ? 60.0 ? ? 59.9 > > ? 1280x854 ? ? ? 59.9 > > ? 1280x800 ? ? ? 59.8 > > ? 1280x720 ? ? ? 59.9 > > ? 1152x768 ? ? ? 59.8 > > ? 1024x768 ? ? ? 60.0 ? ? 59.9 > > ? 800x600 ? ? ? ?60.3 ? ? 59.9 ? ? 56.2 > > ? 848x480 ? ? ? ?59.7 > > ? 720x480 ? ? ? ?59.7 > > ? 640x480 ? ? ? ?59.9 ? ? 59.4 > > DVI-0 connected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) > > ? 1920x1080 ? ? ?59.9 + > > ? 1600x1200 ? ? ?60.0 > > ? 1680x1050 ? ? ?60.0 > > ? 1280x1024 ? ? ?60.0 > > ? 1440x900 ? ? ? 59.9 > > ? 1280x960 ? ? ? 60.0 > > ? 1280x800 ? ? ? 59.8 > > ? 1024x768 ? ? ? 60.0 > > ? 800x600 ? ? ? ?60.3 ? ? 56.2 > > ? 640x480 ? ? ? ?60.0 > > HDMI-0 connected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) > > ? 1920x1080 ? ? ?59.9 + > > ? 1600x1200 ? ? ?60.0 > > ? 1680x1050 ? ? ?60.0 > > ? 1280x1024 ? ? ?60.0 > > ? 1440x900 ? ? ? 59.9 > > ? 1280x960 ? ? ? 60.0 > > ? 1280x800 ? ? ? 59.8 > > ? 1024x768 ? ? ? 60.0 > > ? 800x600 ? ? ? ?60.3 ? ? 56.2 > > ? 640x480 ? ? ? ?60.0 > > > > $ xrandr --output DVI-0 --right-of LVDS > > > > Didn't make a difference.. no picture on the external DVI display. > > > > I wonder if that HDMI-0 is the key to the problem.. I don't have anything > > connected > > to the HDMI connector on the laptop. There's no HDMI connector on the dock, > > it's only in the laptop. > > Indeed that is the problem. On your system the HDMI and DVI ports > share the same encoder and DDC line so they will both come up as > connected since the line is shared. The driver used to check the edid > when the lines where shared and select HDMI or DVI based on the EDID, > but perhaps that got broken at some point. >
Makes sense. Does some kernel option/parameter affect that? -- Pasi