> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlow...@linaro.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2022 11:26 PM
> To: Neal Liu <neal_...@aspeedtech.com>; Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>; Rob Herring <robh...@kernel.org>; Krzysztof
> Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski...@linaro.org>; Joel Stanley <j...@jms.id.au>;
> Andrew Jeffery <and...@aj.id.au>; Felipe Balbi <ba...@kernel.org>; Sumit
> Semwal <sumit.sem...@linaro.org>; Christian König
> <christian.koe...@amd.com>; Geert Uytterhoeven <ge...@linux-m68k.org>;
> Li Yang <leoyang...@nxp.com>
> Cc: linux-asp...@lists.ozlabs.org; linux-...@vger.kernel.org;
> devicet...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org;
> linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-me...@vger.kernel.org;
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; linaro-mm-...@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: dts: aspeed: Add USB2.0 device controller
> node
> 
> On 17/05/2022 17:21, Neal Liu wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> +               udc: udc@1e6a2000 {
> >>>>
> >>>> The same as DTS in bindings - generic node name, please.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Is it possible to use "udc: usb-udc@1e6a2000" to distinguish it between
> "vhub:
> >> usb-vhub@1e6a0000"?
> >>
> >> Possible yes :), but not recommended and not wanted. Nodes should be
> >> generic and prefixes are added only if there is no unit address. You
> >> can though use some more descriptive label.
> >>
> > "udc: usb@1e6a2000" is okay for you?
> 
> Yes, it's perfect.

Great ! I'll update it for next patch.
Thanks for your suggestion.
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

Reply via email to