Am Freitag, dem 18.02.2022 um 02:00 +0100 schrieb Marek Vasut: > The bridge ops are specific to the bridge configuration, move them > into tc_probe_edp_bridge_endpoint() to permit cleaner addition of > DSI-to-DPI mode. No functional change. > > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> > Cc: Jonas Karlman <jo...@kwiboo.se> > Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com> > Cc: Maxime Ripard <max...@cerno.tech> > Cc: Neil Armstrong <narmstr...@baylibre.com> > Cc: Sam Ravnborg <s...@ravnborg.org> > --- > V2: - New patch > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/tc358767.c | 10 +++++----- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/tc358767.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/tc358767.c > index 55b7f3fb9eec9..7dae18de76c97 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/tc358767.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/tc358767.c > @@ -1676,6 +1676,11 @@ static int tc_probe_edp_bridge_endpoint(struct tc_data > *tc) > tc->bridge.type = DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_DisplayPort; > } > > + tc->bridge.funcs = &tc_bridge_funcs;
Could you please also rename those to tc_edp_bridge_funcs? Otherwise I agree with this patch. > + if (tc->hpd_pin >= 0) > + tc->bridge.ops |= DRM_BRIDGE_OP_DETECT; > + tc->bridge.ops |= DRM_BRIDGE_OP_EDID; > + > return ret; > } > > @@ -1757,11 +1762,6 @@ static int tc_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const > struct i2c_device_id *id) > if (ret) > return ret; > > - tc->bridge.funcs = &tc_bridge_funcs; > - if (tc->hpd_pin >= 0) > - tc->bridge.ops |= DRM_BRIDGE_OP_DETECT; > - tc->bridge.ops |= DRM_BRIDGE_OP_EDID; > - > tc->bridge.of_node = dev->of_node; > drm_bridge_add(&tc->bridge); >
