On 01/21/2016 09:46 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 06:11:40PM +0530, Archit Taneja wrote: >> mipi_dsi_devices are inherently aware of their host because they >> share a parent-child hierarchy in the device tree. >> >> non-dsi drivers that create dsi device don't have this data. In order to >> get this information, they require to a phandle to the dsi host in the >> device tree. >> >> Maintain a list of all the hosts DSI that are currently registered. >> >> This list will be used to find the mipi_dsi_host corresponding to the >> device_node passed in of_find_mipi_dsi_host_by_node. >> >> Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda at samsung.com> >> Signed-off-by: Archit Taneja <architt at codeaurora.org> >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h | 3 +++ >> 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+) > > Please be more consistent with the spelling. Abbreviations should be all > capitals. Also s/mipi_dsi_devices/MIPI DSI devices/, and so on.
I'll ensure the abbreviations are consistent in the next revision. > > Otherwise I guess this makes sense. Thanks for the review. Thanks, Archit -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
