Hi Thierry, Can you pick up these DSI patches, or would it make more sense for these to go via someone else?
Thanks, Archit On 12/10/2015 06:11 PM, Archit Taneja wrote: > We are currently restricted when it comes to supporting DSI on devices > that have a non-DSI control bus. For example, DSI encoder chips are > available in the market that are configured via i2c. Configuring their > registers via DSI bus is either optional or not available at all. > > These devices still need to pass DSI parameters (data lanes, mode flags > etc) to the DSI host they are connected to. We don't have a way to do > that at the moment. > > After some discussions on the previous RFC[1], we decided to support this > by providing additional API in drm_mipi_dsi which lets us create new DSI > devices without the need of them to have a DT node. > > [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/30/42 > > Changes in v4: > - Added a new patch that fixes build issues when CONFIG_OF is not set. > > Changes in v3: > > - Incorporated misc comments by Andrzej. Changed from RFC to a PATCH set. > - Fixed htmldocs warnings. > > Archit Taneja (6): > drm/dsi: check for CONFIG_OF when defining of_mipi_dsi_device_add > drm/dsi: Refactor device creation > drm/dsi: Try to match non-DT dsi devices > drm/dsi: Check for used channels > drm/dsi: Add routine to unregister dsi device > drm/dsi: Get DSI host by DT device node > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c | 144 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- > include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h | 29 +++++++++ > 2 files changed, 141 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) > -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
