Is there a fix coming for this, Timo? Or is it a longer term issue?
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Larry Rosenman <larry...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It doesn't in my current 2.2.18 setup with the config I posted.
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Timo Sirainen <t...@iki.fi> wrote:
>
>> It should.
>>
>> On 08 Sep 2015, at 01:01, Larry Rosenman <larry...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> should fts_autoindex handle that case?
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Timo Sirainen <t...@iki.fi> wrote:
>>
>>> On 09/08/2015 12:56 AM, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>>> > that the fts data gets lost?
>>>
>>> All full text search backends are now implemented so that if you
>>> copy/move mails, the mails need to be indexed again the destination
>>> folder.
>>>
>>> Alternative would be to index mails only with their GUIDs and have a
>>> GUID => { folder GUID, IMAP UID } mapping and filter the mails based on
>>> that. But such reverse index doesn't exist quite yet.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
>> Phone: +1 214-642-9640 (c) E-Mail: larry...@gmail.com
>> US Mail: 7011 W Parmer Ln, Apt 1115, Austin, TX 78729-6961
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
> Phone: +1 214-642-9640 (c) E-Mail: larry...@gmail.com
> US Mail: 7011 W Parmer Ln, Apt 1115, Austin, TX 78729-6961
>
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 214-642-9640 (c) E-Mail: larry...@gmail.com
US Mail: 7011 W Parmer Ln, Apt 1115, Austin, TX 78729-6961
