should fts_autoindex handle that case?
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Timo Sirainen <t...@iki.fi> wrote:
> On 09/08/2015 12:56 AM, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> > that the fts data gets lost?
>
> All full text search backends are now implemented so that if you
> copy/move mails, the mails need to be indexed again the destination folder.
>
> Alternative would be to index mails only with their GUIDs and have a
> GUID => { folder GUID, IMAP UID } mapping and filter the mails based on
> that. But such reverse index doesn't exist quite yet.
>
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 214-642-9640 (c) E-Mail: larry...@gmail.com
US Mail: 7011 W Parmer Ln, Apt 1115, Austin, TX 78729-6961
