> Le 26 janv. 2015 à 11:21, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> a écrit : > > > Am 26.01.2015 um 10:52 schrieb Stéphane Cottin: >>> Le 26 janv. 2015 à 10:09, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> a écrit : >>>>> You're stilling going to lose contents. If dspam fails, the mail >>>>> is dumped, the LDA returns exit code 75, and the MTA will probably >>>>> issue a bounce Email to the sender. >>>> >>>> which would be OK, if "never loose email contents" means "no message is >>>> discarded silently". >>> >>> no, it is not OK to backscatter because the spamfilter fails >>> >>> realize that 99% auf junk is using forged senders >>> >>> recently i got each day some hundret such bounces from mailservers >>> configured by fools reply to spam with forged senders and if i could i >>> would have gone out for beat every responsible admin straight in the face >> >> I may discard emails based on RBLs, but I don't want to discard emails based >> on statistical fllters, I prefer deliver them in the Junk folder and let the >> user have a chance to reclassify using dovecot_antispam. >> And yes, bounce spams to (forged or not) sender is useless > > you *must not* discard mails - in no context - period
right, s/discard/reject/ > > that's why milters exist to tag between let say 5.0 and 8.0 spam points and > REJECT pre-queue based on SpamAssassin and/or ClamAV > > maybe dspam can't do that, but it's *abandonware* anyways > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.dspam.user/19136 dspam is fast and lightweight, ideal for low memory virtual servers, and AFAIK the only spamassasin alternative.
